Breaking News
US court rules against Arkansas' Israel boycott pledge law Open in fullscreen

The New Arab Staff & Agencies

US court rules against Arkansas' Israel boycott pledge law

BDS is a movement aiming to end international support for Israel [Getty]

Date of publication: 13 February, 2021

Share this page:
  • 0

  • twitter
A US court has ruled that forcing companies not to boycott Israel was "unconstitutional".
A federal appeals court on Friday ruled that Arkansas' law requiring state contractors to pledge not to boycott Israel is unconstitutional.

A three-judge panel of the 8th US Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a federal judge's 2019 decision that dismissed the lawsuit by the Arkansas Times challenging the requirement.

The newspaper had asked the judge to block the law, which requires contractors with the state to reduce their fees by 20% if they don't sign the pledge.

The court said the law is written so broadly that it would also apply to vendors that support or promote a boycott.

"The Act prohibits the contractor from engaging in boycott activity outside the scope of the contractual relationship 'on its own time and dime'," the court said in its 2-1 decision.

"Such a restriction violates the First Amendment."

The Times’ lawsuit said the University of Arkansas Pulaski Technical College refused to contract for advertising with the newspaper unless the Arkansas Times signed the pledge.

The newspaper is not engaged in a boycott against Israel.

The appeals panel sent the case back to US District Judge Brian Miller, who ruled in 2019 that refusing to purchase items wasn't protected speech by the First Amendment.

"Arkansas politicians had no business penalizing our clients for refusing to participate in this ideological litmus test," said Holly Dickson, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas, which represented the Times in the case.

"Free speech isn’t a privilege you pay for, it’s a right guaranteed to every Arkansan."

Arkansas' law is similar to restrictions enacted in other states that have been challenged.

The measures are aimed at a movement protesting Israel's policies toward Palestinians.

Similar measures in Arizona, Kansas and Texas that were blocked were later allowed to be enforced after lawmakers narrowed the requirement so it only applied to larger contracts. Arkansas’ law applies to contracts worth $1,000 or more.

Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge's office said she was reviewing the opinion to determine the next step.

"The Attorney General is disappointed in the Eighth Circuit’s decision, which interferes with Arkansas’s law banning discrimination against Israel, an important American ally," spokesperson Amanda Priest said in a statement.

The non-violent Boycott Divestment Sanctions (BDS) is a movement aimed at ending international support for Israel and pressure it to comply with international law.

BDS is comprised of over 170 Palestinian civil society organisations, unions, and cultural and rights groups - including all major political parties, trade and academic unions - issued its official call for boycott in 2005.

The BDS movement says it is inspired by the campaign that targeted South Africa's apartheid regime and is seeking to put an end to Israel's brutal occupation of the West Bank.

Follow us on FacebookTwitter and Instagram to stay connected

The New ArabComments

Most Popular

Most Popular

    Read More